Katherine M. Koza "argues that a new U.N. cybercrime treaty should build on the strengths of the Budapest Convention by including a clearer 'extradite-or-prosecute' requirement for its signatories and by creating strong privacy requirements to counterbalance the risks created by any data-sharing provisions."
Tag: international law
Responding to Profs. Chander & Schwartz’s Privacy and/or Trade, Profs. Kristina Irion, Margot E. Kaminski & Svetlana Yakovleva argue that "international trade as a regime is fundamentally the wrong forum for striking a balance" between "the free flow of information and the protection of data privacy."
Joaquin Gonzalez argues that E.U. Members States should pass "a farm animal welfare law mimicking California’s Prop 12" and that this approach "would be legal under an exception for laws regarding public morality."
Analyzing the First Circuit's opinion in Moore v. British Airways PLC, Kelsey Roberts suggests that when "courts determine whether there was an accident" under the Montreal Convention, they should do so from "the airline’s perspective, as measured by airline policies and industry standards."
Caitlan M. Sussman explores whether extradited defendants have standing to challenge their American prosecutions under extradition treaties.
Alexander C. Meade explains why grand juries should win out in the clash between foreign data privacy laws and U.S. criminal proceedings.
The University of Chicago Law School's International Human Rights Clinic unveils a groundbreaking study on police use of force.
The Case of Adham Hassoun and Section 412 of the USA Patriot Act When it was enacted—a mere seven weeks after the attacks of September 11th—the USA PATRIOT Act provided the government with the authority to detain, possibly indefinitely, non-deportable aliens on US soil that the Attorney General had reason to believe were a threat to … Continue reading The Unreasonableness of the Citizenship Distinction: Section 412 of the USA PATRIOT Act and Lessons from Abroad by Nino Guruli
Our recent article, War Manifestos, was the first work of legal scholarship to examine the documents that set out the legal reasons sovereigns provided for going to war from the late fifteenth century until the mid-twentieth century. The article described these “war manifestos” and explored their history and evolution over the course of five centuries. … Continue reading The Origins of War Manifestos by Oona A. Hathaway, William S. Holste, Scott J. Shapiro, Jacqueline Van De Velde, and Lisa Wang Lachowicz