Skip to content
The University of Chicago Law Review Online

The University of Chicago Law Review Online

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Print
  • About
  • Submit a Post
Post

Virtual Criminal Courts

Deniz Ariturk, William E. Crozier, and Brandon L. Garrett survey the transformation wrought by virtual court proceedings.

November 16, 2020November 15, 2020covid series, COVID-19Leave a comment
Post

COVID-19 and the Ruralization of U.S. Criminal Court Systems

Pamela Metzger and Gregory Guggenmos show how rural communities have long struggled with the distance, scale, and scarcity that the pandemic has now brought to more populous places.

November 16, 2020November 15, 2020covid series, COVID-19Leave a comment
Post

Policing the Pandemic

Barry Friedman and Robin Tholin argue that restraining the pandemic will require judicious application of government power.

November 16, 2020November 16, 2020covid series, COVID-19Leave a comment
Post

Policing Opioid Use Disorder in a Pandemic

Jennifer Oliva examines how the pandemic has disrupted access to opioid treatment—and for some more than others.

November 16, 2020November 15, 2020covid series, COVID-191 Comment
Podcast

Briefly 4.7 – Law, Psychology & False Confessions

Why do people confess to crimes they didn't commit? Host Taiyee Chien and guest Professor Richard A. Leo (U. San Francisco Law) explore this difficult and persistent psychological phenomenon—and how the law can address it going forward.

November 11, 2020November 10, 2020Leave a comment
Post

Talking About Affirmative Action

What can a debate between two political adversaries in October 1996 teach us about the affirmative-action debate today? Matthew Reade explains.

Featured Postaffirmative action, free speech, Prop. 209Leave a comment
Post

Affirmative Action: Towards a Coherent Debate

Coleman Hughes frames the affirmative-action debate as a contest between three positions: the pro-equality position, the pro-equity position, and the middle ground between them.

Featured Postaffirmative action, antiracism, civil-rights movement, Prop. 16, Prop. 2099 Comments
Post

Fifteen Questions About Prop. 16 and Prop. 209

Richard Sander asks and answers fifteen questions about California's antidiscrimination provisions and their proposed repeal.

Featured Postaffirmative action, graduation rates, Prop. 16, Prop. 209Leave a comment
Post

Good Trouble

Girardeau Spann hopes that ongoing protests against racial injustice across the United States reflect an emerging consensus around the pro-equity conception of affirmative action—a consensus that may prompt the Supreme Court to embrace the view that the Constitution requires efforts to "eradicat[e] racially disparate impact."

Featured Postaffirmative action, disparate impact, popular constitutionalism, racial equalityLeave a comment
Post

“All (Poor) Lives Matter”: How Class-Not-Race Logic Reinscribes Race and Class Privilege

Jonathan Feingold criticizes the Supreme Court's "preference" for "class-not-race" affirmative action as "intersectional blindness"—a failure to recognize that hardship may attach simultaneously to many different facets of a person's identity.

Featured Postaffirmative action, critical-race theory, intersectionalityLeave a comment

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts

Recent Posts

  • Briefly 4.9 – The United States of Bankruptcy
  • Briefly 4.8 – NPAs and DPAs: 10 Years Since Massey
  • Oboe Judging

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017

Tags

absentee voting absolute priority administrative law affirmative action algorithmic fairness american indian law antiracism antitrust appellate courts appellate procedure appropriations power arbitration Article II bankruptcy bankruptcy financing big tech Bivens briefly Business Roundtable Cabinet campaign finance CARES Act censorship CFPB civil-rights movement civil enforcement civil procedure civil protective order class arbitration Commerce Clause Congress conservatism conservative minimalism constitutional law content regulation contracts coronavirus corporate governance corporate governance symposium corporations COVID-19 covid series criminal law critical-race theory Department of Labor Diane Wood disclosure disparate impact diversity Dodd-Frank Donald Trump Don McGahn due process duty Edmund Burke election law employment law equity ESG evidence executive branch Facebook Facebook Oversight Board FDA FDCA federal courts Federal Election Commission Federal Reserve feminism FHFA financial regulation First Amendment food labeling for-cause removal Fourteenth Amendment fourth amendment free exercise free speech gig economy Google government accountability graduation rates grand jury Hertz human rights immigration law independent agencies inequality insider trading inspector general interbranch disputes international law intersectionality introduction John Marshall John Roberts Josh Blackman Judge Harry Edwards judicial administration judicial appointments judicial review jurisdiction labor law legal history localism machine learning mail-in ballot Martindell Matt Levine McGirt v. Oklahoma meat substitutes Michael Scudder ministerial exception NLEA nondelegation doctrine occupation shortages online voter registration oversight pandemic pandemic elections partisan deadlock pass-through deduction Paul Finkelman plant-based products police brutality police reform police unions police use of force policing popular constitutionalism precedent preemption presidential power privacy Prop. 16 Prop. 209 property prosecutorial discretion public finance qualified-immunity appeals qualified immunity quarantine racial equality readingrecs regulatory history relative priority Religion Clauses Roberts Court same day registration Schedule A SCOTUS SEC Section 230 securities fraud Seila Law series separation of powers SFFA v. Harvard shareholders slavery slices and lumps symposium social media spousal privilege stakeholder primacy stock buybacks subpoena tax tax-exempt tax cuts TCJA technology technology regulation torts unitary executive university admissions voter registration voting rights water law white collar White House Counsel year in review
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Podcast
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
The University of Chicago Law Review Online
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Shoreditch.