H. Javier Kordi details how personalized law, by avoiding arbitrary age cutoffs, could result in true universal suffrage.
Catalina Goanta argues that personalized law is the modern application of the centuries-old, open-ended norm of good faith.
Cary Coglianese proposes custom and competence as solutions to overcome the challenges facing the implementation of personalized law.
Horst Eidenmüller argues that the best normative justification for personalized law, utility maximization, supports a limited role for personalization in lawmaking.
Host Reagan Kapp and Professor Nathan Chapman (U. of Georgia School of Law) discuss the interplay between the First Amendment's freedom of religion and state and federal vaccine mandates.
Felipe Ford Cole details how race played a role in the development of international investment law during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.