Skip to content
The University of Chicago Law Review Online

The University of Chicago Law Review Online

Started in 2018, The University of Chicago Law Review Online is an online platform focused on publishing legal analysis and scholarship for a general-interest audience. 

  • Home
  • Print
  • Podcast
  • About

Month: March 2022

Series

Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People

Omri Ben-Shahar and Ariel Porat examine the challenges and opportunities of a new legal paradigm—one where rules vary person by person—in light of their recent book, Personalized Law.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

But What Is Personalized Law?

Sandra G. Mayson aims to clarify the concept of personalized law by considering the nature of legal rules, which must all generalize on some dimension.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Personalized Law: Distinctions and Procedural Observations

Hans Christoph Grigoleit takes a look at personalized law's procedural consequences for the allocation of functions between the legislature and judiciary.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Tailoring ex Machina: Perspectives on Personalized Law

Gregory Klass argues that personalized law imagines an alternative form of lawmaking, one that presupposes abilities that human lawmakers do not possess.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Personalized Damages

Catherine M. Sharkey explores the issues which arise in tort law from applying personalized law to standards of care but not damages.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Implementing Personalized Negligence Law

Jared I. Mayer proposes feedback mechanisms as a way to overcome the limitations of personalized standards of care in tort law.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Personalized Law, Political Power, and the Dangerous Few

Adam Davidson warns that personalized commands could be shaped and abused by the moral and political judgements of bad actors.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Personalization and the Constitution

Netta Barak-Corren addresses the effects of personalized law on constitutional rights, personal autonomy, and choice.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Complex Algorithmic Law

Peter N. Salib previews the problems that could arise if personalized law is powered by cutting-edge, artificial intelligence algorithms.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment
Post

Two Cheers for Cyborgs

Lauren Henry Scholz contends that a cyborg system of law, one that relies on human-machine collaboration, can achieve the benefits of personalized law with more limited technology.

Featured PostPersonalized Law seriesLeave a comment

Posts navigation

Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Examining Causation Standards in False Claims Act Cases Predicated on Anti-Kickback Statute Violations
  • Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC—Should Wrongful Death Suits from COVID-19 Be Heard Exclusively in Federal Courts?
  • On the Manner of the Appointment of Justices to the Supreme Court: Revising Federalist No. 78

Archives

  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017

Tags

absentee voting absolute priority administrative law adoptees adoption law affirmative action algorithmic fairness american indian law animals antiracism antitrust appellate courts appellate procedure appropriations power arbitration Article II bankruptcy bankruptcy financing big tech Bivens briefly Business Roundtable Cabinet campaign finance CARES Act censorship CFPB civil-rights movement civil enforcement civil procedure civil protective order class actions class arbitration Commerce Clause compassionate release Congress conservatism conservative minimalism constitutional law consumer protection law content regulation contracts copyright law coronavirus corporate governance corporate governance symposium corporate law corporations corpus linguistics COVID-19 covid series criminal justice criminal law critical-race theory data privacy death penalty demographics Department of Labor Diane Wood disability discrimination disclosure discovery disparate impact distributed corporations diversity Dodd-Frank Donald Trump Don McGahn due process duty Edmund Burke Eighth Amendment election law elections electoral college empirical constitutional studies employment law environmental law equity ESG evidence executive branch experimental jurisprudence extradition Facebook Facebook Oversight Board false claims act FDA FDCA federal courts Federal Election Commission federal habeas corpus Federal Reserve feminism FHFA fifa world cup financial regulation fintech First Amendment first step act food labeling for-cause removal foreign sovereign immunity Fourteenth Amendment fourth amendment free assembly free exercise free speech FTC gig economy Google government accountability graduation rates grand jury Hertz history human rights immigration law independent agencies inequality insider trading inspector general intellectual property interbranch disputes international arbitration international investment international law intersectionality introduction John Marshall John Roberts Josh Blackman Judge Harry Edwards judicial administration judicial appointments judicial review jurisdiction jurisprudence justiciability labor law law and economics Law Review Symposium 2022 legal history legal interpretation localism machine learning mail-in ballot Martindell Matt Levine McGirt v. Oklahoma meat substitutes media method-of-execution challenges Michael Scudder ministerial exception minors Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act NLEA nondelegation doctrine nuisance occupation shortages online voter registration oversight pandemic pandemic elections partisan deadlock pass-through deduction Paul Finkelman Personalized Law series plant-based products police brutality police reform police unions police use of force policing popular constitutionalism precedent preemption presidential power principal place of business prison privacy Prop. 16 Prop. 209 property prosecutorial discretion public defenders public finance qualified-immunity appeals qualified immunity quarantine racial equality readingrecs regulatory history relative priority Religion Clauses religious freedom remedies Roberts Court same day registration Schedule A SCOTUS SEC second amendment Section 230 securities fraud securities law Seila Law series separation of powers sex education SFFA v. Harvard shadow docket shareholders slavery slices and lumps symposium social media spousal privilege stakeholder primacy standing state-created-danger doctrine statutory interpretation stock buybacks subpoena supreme court reform tax tax-exempt tax cuts TCJA technology technology regulation Title IX torts unitary executive university admissions veterans law voter registration voting voting rights water law white collar White House Counsel worker's compensation year in review

Accessibility Information

Accessibility
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Podcast
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
The University of Chicago Law Review Online
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Shoreditch.
 

Loading Comments...